Young Researchers in Digital Humanities: A Manifesto

YesWeDigitalDeutsche Fassung: Wissenschaftlicher Nachwuchs in den Digital Humanities: Ein Manifest

Version française : Jeunes chercheurs et humanités numérique : un manifeste

Versión española: Jóvenes Investigadores en Humanidades Digitales: un Manifiesto

The Humanities and Social Sciences are a vital component of human culture and offer an essential insight into the world in which we live. The Digital Humanities reflect the transition of the Humanities to the digital age. However, they do not only bring with them new technical means, but also new forms of knowledge creation and dissemination within, across and outside academic disciplines.

In the field of Digital Humanities, experimental practices, reflexivity and the collaborative elaboration of standards are deeply interconnected. They are, therefore, an occasion to rethink and extend the Humanities through new materials, methods and hermeneutics. Furthermore, they represent an opportunity to redefine our relationship to society through open access to cultural heritage and the development of collaborative projects which also engage non-academic audiences. Thus, we see them as pivotal in the future of the Humanities.

Three years ago, over 100 members of this emergent community took part in THATCamp Paris 2010. Together, they wrote the first European Manifesto of the Digital Humanities to express their commitment to this new field of studies. Subsequently, the number of individuals and projects involved has increased significantly, giving them much greater visibility.

The academic world, however, with its institutions, actors and practices has not evolved at the same pace. On the one hand, new modes of research – connected, collaborative, horizontal, multimodal, multidisciplinary and multilingual – are being developed. Digital practitioners are engaged in new activities and work with new tools, building databases, developing software, analysing big datasets, defining conceptual models, collaborating through wikis and pads, communicating through websites, blogs and other social media. On the other hand, research institutions often resist or hinder these changes: training for scholars, funding schemes, evaluation criteria, recruitment and promotion procedures have only marginally evolved and do not seem able to make the most out of the digital environment.

The widening gap between flourishing digital practices and their institutional acknowledgment represent a threat for the academic community as a whole and for young scholars in particular, since it casts uncertainty on their future as research professionals.

On 10-11 June 2013 scholars and other members of the academic community met at the German Historical Institute in Paris to participate in the international conference “Research Conditions and Digital Humanities: What are the Prospects for the Next Generation?”. The conference was preceded by an open “call to join the blogparade”, that is to publish online contributions, in order to collectively and publicly prepare the event.

This manifesto is the result of this process. It emphasises the most important aspects of the challenges and the most pressing institutional needs.

I. General

Young researchers in all disciplines face a high level of job insecurity, the consequences of short-term contracts and the risk of never obtaining permanent positions. Digital humanists feel this pressure even more, due to relatively shorter funding periods, few suitable positions and a lack of clear career perspectives.

  • Long-term career perspectives should be available to early career researchers, engineers, and librarians who engage in Digital Humanities work.
  • Senior researchers should encourage, counsel and support them. This aspect is also stressed in the recommendations of the Young Researchers Forum convened by the European Science Foundation in 2011 (Changing Publication Cultures in the Humanities).
  • Fair principles and clearly-defined guidelines should be established to assess the scholarly relevance of digital collaborative contributions and attribute relevant merit to all participants.
  • The diversity of digital media and publication genres need to be accepted as genuine means of scientific communication.

Significant work by digital humanists remains below the radar of internal and external evaluations: it should not be ignored by their peers.

  • Open Access and Open Data publications need to be encouraged and sustained – by opening up participation, supplying adequate funding and increasing academic recognition.
  • The right to re-publish texts needs to be implemented in European and national law, in order to ensure legal security when engaging in the “green road” in Open Access.

Research and teaching with digital tools require specific skills and infrastructures. To create conditions in which those can deploy, we need:

  • Suitable and sustainable academic infrastructures such as repositories, publication platforms, catalogues, social media networks and blogging portals.
  • A public project database providing national and European information on submitted projects in DH, whether successful or rejected, for better orientation and coordination through greater transparency.
  • Ambitious digital training programs in the Humanities, which should address all generations and all levels of skills and needs. Advanced students, junior and senior researchers need appropriate training.

As humanists we value intercultural dialogue and multilingualism. Publications in English should not be exclusive, but encouraged as a complement to publications in other native languages.

II. Research and higher education institutions

Coherent digital strategies should be developed and sustained in every institution. Academic societies and universities should support early-careers in Digital Humanities through adequate funding periods, promotion of tenure and long-term sustainability both for researchers and technology. They should foster early experience in collaborative work, as well as team-based technical expertise.

We advocate for the establishment of specialised working groups to encourage digital undertakings and to allow cross-disciplinary research. Institutions need to support this by creating a scientific ecosystem for Digital Humanities practitioners, including:

  • trusted Open Access platforms
  • long-term archives and technologies and infrastructures for the long-term archiving of research publications and research data in combination with an Open Access and Open Data policy
  • database and software infrastructures (e.g. Big Data and Linked Data applications)
  • efficient tools for the digitisation of analog sources
  • search engines and metadata tools which facilitate the findability, contextualisation and evaluation of digital media
  • promotion of open educational resources and Creative Commons licenses

Scholarly blogging, activities in social media and reviewing in non-traditional formats must be officially recognised and encouraged. Research institutions should provide expertise and training to ensure that the following skills are available: use of social media in research and public communication, encoding, website management, database construction and multimedia editing. All professionals involved must also have sufficient knowledge of legal questions, with particular regard to traditional copyright and open licenses.

III. Funding agencies

It is important that funding agencies take into consideration the needs of scientific communities, since they decide which digital projects, institutions and infrastructures are supported and how their results are evaluated. Funding agencies need to be aware that digital projects, especially when they include a website, never really end: continuous support beyond the initial funding period is essential (e.g. for server costs and technical maintenance).

We need funding agencies to build specific programs to support collaborative research across national borders, sustainable research infrastructures and practical training in the use of digital research tools.

We need funding agencies to develop new evaluation procedures, which take into account both digital formats and digital qualifications.

  • Peer-reviewed texts in print journals can no longer be the only publications to be considered in application and proposal procedures. Various practices of digital scholarly communication, reviewing and publication must be recognised and encouraged.
  • The evaluation of Digital Humanities projects should take new criteria into account: scientific quality, technical quality and usage.
  • The traditional circle of reviewers needs to be broadened: experts on digital media, computer scientists and engineers have to be included in order to allow reliable evaluation.
  • Funding agencies should integrate open peer review and open commentary in their assessment procedures.

 What’s next?

Practitioners and observers often regret the slow pace at which infrastructures evolve. While a new research culture is being established, in which the value of digital means and methods will be fully acknowledged, positive action must be taken to adapt academic structures to new research practices. This is a fundamental and very concrete task for everyone, in each academic field and discipline. We can all contribute to this common reinvention.

The first signers were the participants (on-site and online) of the conference “Research Conditions and Digital Humanities: What are the Prospects for the Next Generation?”. To support the manifesto, please leave a comment below.

Pascal Arnaud
Anne Baillot
Aurélien Berra
Dominique Boullier
Thomas Cauvin
Georgios Chatzoudis
Arianna Ciula
Camille Desenclos
André Donk
Marten Düring
Natalia Filatkina
Sascha Foerster
Sebastian Gießmann
Martin Grandjean
Franziska Heimburger
Christian Jacob
Mareike König
Marion Lamé
Lilian Landes
Matthias Lemke
Anika Meier
Benoît Majerus
Claudine Moulin
Pierre Mounier
Marc Mudrak
Cynthia Pedroja
Jean-Michel Salaün
Markus Schnöpf
Julian Schulz
Bertram Triebel
Milena Žic-Fuchs


Photo: Yes we digital! by Martin Grandjean, CC-BY-SA.

OpenEdition schlägt Ihnen vor, diesen Beitrag wie folgt zu zitieren:
dhiparis (4. Juli 2013). Young Researchers in Digital Humanities: A Manifesto. Digital Humanities am DHIP. Abgerufen am 20. Juli 2024 von

Das könnte dich auch interessieren …

87 Antworten

  1. I’d like to join this. I sign!

  2. Two years later, this Manifesto remains remains a fully current concern: I sign the Manifesto!

  3. Woops. A little late, but I sign the manifesto and thanks for referencing my blog post in your “call for postings”-phase. Thank you for all your work.

  4. Eric Omazu sagt:

    Yes, I digital. I sign the Manifesto. Good dreams and good planning. Can’t this become a global association instead of just European?

  5. Mi más pleno apoyo al manifiesto, Manuel
    Santiago de Chile

  6. Miguel Fernandez Diaz sagt:

    Yes, I digital. I sign the Manifesto!

  7. Paolo Guarda sagt:

    I sign the Manifesto!

  8. Federica G. sagt:

    I sign the manifesto!

  9. Yes, I digital! I subscribe the Manifesto.

  10. Giulia Dore sagt:

    Yes, I digital. I sign the Manifesto.

  11. Arlie Doud sagt:

    I guess that’s just the way it is until we reconsider policy changes. We’ll see though.

  12. René sagt:

    Clear statements, I support this Manifesto.

  13. Rosario Rodrigues sagt:

    I sign the manifesto

  14. I support the manifesto.

  15. I sign the manifesto. Congratulations for the initiative!

  16. Although I’m not a researcher in Humanities (and I’m not young either :-)), I sign the manifesto, which I would extend to all scientific research.

  17. I am digital too. Agree and signed. Congrats for idea!

  18. Carlos Sanz sagt:

    I have published a Spanish version of the Manifesto in my blog. I hope you don’t mind. I think this initiative deserves a broad dissemination and I thought I could put my two cents this way.

    • Mareike König sagt:

      We not only don’t mind, we are actually very grateful for that! Muchas gracias! Hopefully the manifesto will have a lot of Spanish readers.

  19. Yes, I digital! Signed! Great initiative!

  20. I hereby sign, with many profound thanks to the original creators and signatories of the manifesto.

  21. Frederik Elwert sagt:

    I hereby sign this manifesto.

    Now let’s get our hands dirty … 🙂

  22. Get deep! Get open! Get digital!
    Yes, I (Christoph Hesse) sign this manifesto.

    // Still working on my own DH-Project btw..maybe it’ll be online this year. //

  23. Ronny Gey sagt:

    Yes, I digital!
    I’d like to sign the manifesto as well.

  24. Signed! Thank you to all active and passive supporters.

  25. Mari Sarv sagt:

    I sign. Developing the databases, digital repository, archival infosystem etc. is not acknowledged as a “real” result of research activities. Takes a lot of time and effort, and requires thorough competence on the subject.

  26. Byron Schirbock sagt:

    I sign! … and I add a big “thanks” to the first signers for their great effort!

  27. I sign this manifesto!

  28. I, Digital (like I, Robot). I sign the manifesto.

  29. *sign*, though almost senior already…

  30. Hubert Mara sagt:

    I sign the Manifesto!

    Coming form computer science I totally agree with Michael’s motto: I humanitise digitally — especially in 3D 🙂

  31. Leif Isaksen sagt:

    I can has digital? I sign the manifesto!

  32. I sign this manifesto!

    As someone from scientific computing it’s a bit the other way round: Yes, I humanitise (digitally, of course)!

  33. I sign the Manifesto! 🙂

  34. Rosanna Cantavella sagt:

    As a senior researcher and college professor at the Universitat de València, I adhere to this important manifesto.

    Of course these terrible cuts all along Europe add serious difficulties to our aim, but what is asked for here is obvious and should be acknowledged.

    Even more, I cannot see as alternative or incompatible the funding of digital humanities and the funding of traditional work in the humanities: I see it merging in a collaboration of methods, so as that all aspects of the humanities are enriched.

  35. Leon de Kock sagt:

    Yes, I digital. And I’m worried, as an African, about the apparent gap between DH initiatives in the North and Australia (India?), on the one hand, and Africa on the other, including South Africa, where almost nothing is happening.

  36. Laurent Romary sagt:

    I sign with both hands, but even more, engage the battle to change the current scholarly landscape in the perspective of the manifesto (as a “senior” ;-))

  37. Thomas Koentges sagt:

    Good goals.

  38. I sign the Manifesto.

  39. There’s a lot of work to do, especially persuading at non-university research institutions. but it works! so, yes, I digital!

  40. Stan Ruecker sagt:

    Well done.

  41. Yes, I digital. I sign the Manifesto

  42. Paul Bertrand sagt:

    I sign this Manifesto. Of course…

  43. Not so young anymore, more of a senior researcher, but: “Yes, I digital. I sign the Manifesto.”

  44. I sign the manifesto!

  45. Timo Lüke sagt:

    Thank you! *sign*

  46. viola voß sagt:

    yes, I digital!
    and I also sign the manifesto. 🙂

  47. Great Job!
    YES, I’m digital too and sign the manifesto.

  48. R. Schreg sagt:

    This discussion is urgently needed within German archaeology. Blogging is not only important for academic discussions, it also has an important potential for integrating the broader public into archaeology and thus for protecting archaeological sites.
    YES, I digital. 😉

  49. Klaus Graf sagt:

    I sign, of course.

  50. Anna caprarelli sagt:

    Yes, I digital. I sign the Manifesto!

  51. Serge Proulx sagt:

    La pensée sur le numérique a besoin d’être renouvelée.
    Oui, je signe le Manifeste !

  52. piotrr sagt:

    Jean-Claude Zancarini, from Lyon University and Triangle Laboratory : signs the manfesto

  53. praxsozi sagt:

    Who needs a Manifesto?People like me, we do live in a digital – silent-world build by Echtzeitmassenmedien, gelle? So we need a Manifesto. I sign it. “Yes i digital.”

    Alfred Fuhr

  54. I sign the Manifesto.

  55. Yes, I digital. I sign the Manifesto.

  56. Ok, here it is: YES, I digital. I sign the Manifesto.

    Although I dreadfully miss the verb in the first sentence and my language-nerd heart breaks to pieces… 🙁

    I’ll share the manifesto with my Oslo-based and other Norwegian and Nordic friends & colleagues.
    Go DH!


    • Mareike König sagt:

      Thank you for signing! What is wrong with “are” as a verb?

      • piotrr sagt:

        Annika was thinking about “We/I digital”. I digital, you digital, he/she digitals, we all digital for digital humanities 😉

        This “I digital” was my (bad) idea. Sorry for that. Mareike, may be be you could edit your first comment and remove the “I digital” recommendation ?

        • Mareike König sagt:

          Oh,ok,sorry,Annika, I didn’t get that! I’ll edit the first comment, but if I remove the recommendation it looks funny for those who already followed it…. I’ll find a way.

  57. Olivier Baude sagt:

    I sign the Manifesto !

  58. Yes, I digital. I sign the Manifesto!

  59. Yes, I digital. I sign the Manifesto!

  60. Emmanuel Chateau sagt:

    Thanks a lot for your kind answer. So, “Yes, I digital. I sign the Manifesto !”.

  61. Emmanuel Chateau sagt:

    Great ! How do we sign ?
    Is it also planned to get it signed by institutions ?

  1. 05/07/2013

    […] See on […]

  2. 05/07/2013

    […] Young Researchers in Digital Humanities: A Manifesto | Digital Humanities am DHIP […]

  3. 07/07/2013

    […] Young Researchers in Digital Humanities: A Manifesto | Digital Humanities am DHIP "The widening gap between flourishing digital practices and their institutional acknowledgment represent a threat for the academic community as a whole and for young scholars in particular, since it casts uncertainty on their future as research professionals." Being asked about how to sign the manifesto to show support, the answer is at the moment: "We are about to find a solution for that." Hmmm. Yes, we need to support the digital humanities indeed… […]

  4. 09/07/2013

    […] Open Access forderten, haben sich young researchers der digital humanities zusammengetan, um sich ein Manifesto zu geben. Dort ist unter anderem zu […]

  5. 09/07/2013

    […] Menge Wünschenswertes steht im Young Researchers in Digital Humanities: A Manifesto, das Anfang Juni 2013 beim internationalem Kolloqium “Research Conditions and Digital […]

  6. 01/09/2013

    […] Los primeros firmantes fueron los participantes (in situ y en línea) de la conferencia “Research Conditions and Digital Humanities: What are the Prospects for the Next Generation?”. Para apoyar el manifiesto, puede hacerse dejando un comentario en el enlace […]

  7. 03/09/2013

    […] English Version: Young Researchers in Digital Humanities: A Manifesto […]

  8. 23/09/2013

    […] echar un vistazo al texto del Manifiesto aquí (versión en […]

  9. 15/11/2013

    […] English Version: Young Researchers in Digital Humanities: A Manifesto […]

  10. 06/12/2013

    […] [xiii] DHI PARIS, Young Researchers in Digital Humanities: A Manifesto, article en ligne, consulté le 29/11/2013, […]

  11. 03/09/2014

    […] ich daran glaube, dass wis­sen­schaft­li­che Inhalte frei ver­füg­bar sein müs­sen (mehr: Mani­fest der Digi­tal Huma­nities). Dazu kam bei mei­ner Magis­ter­ar­beit der „ein­fa­che“ Wunsch, das Buch auf Papier […]

  12. 29/09/2016

    […] We ask that you review the MLA and AHA guidelines for evaluation of digital scholarship and the Young Researchers in Digital Humanities Manifesto. […]

Schreibe einen Kommentar zu Christian Stein Antworten abbrechen

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Diese Website verwendet Akismet, um Spam zu reduzieren. Erfahre mehr darüber, wie deine Kommentardaten verarbeitet werden.

Suche in OpenEdition Search

Sie werden weitergeleitet zur OpenEdition Search